Home About FCA News & Events Reports & Publications Law & Regulations Exam Guidance FCS Information FCA Logo

Return to Public CommentsPrevious PagePrevious Comment LetterNext Comment LetterNext Page

Notice of Petition - "Compensation, Retirement Programs and Related Benefits"

Alfred Porter
5651 Balloon Fiesta Parkway NE
Albuquerque, NM 87113-2164

April 19, 2013

Barry F Mardock
Deputy Director, Office of Regulatory Policy, Farm Credit Administration
1501 Farm Credit Drive
McLean, VA 22102-5090

Dear Barry Mardock:

Farm Credit of New Mexico appreciates the opportunity to respond to the
Agency‚€™s publication of the Regulatory Petition filed by The Farm Credit
Council in regard to the ‚€œsay on pay‚€Ě provisions in the Final Rule
regarding ‚€œCompensation, Retirement Programs, and Related Benefits‚€Ě
and to respond to the question raised by the Agency that follows:

What reasonable alternative(s) to the non-binding, advisory vote
provisions on senior officer compensation would comparably engage
shareholders and provide them greater transparency in and disclosure of
their institution‚€™s senior officer compensation practices?

As previously written to FCA by Farm Credit of New Mexico, we concur with
The Farm Credit Council that it was not the intent of Congress to create a
non-binding vote for senior compensation.  To clarify Congress‚€™ intent,
we agree that an alternative is to ask them if a ‚€œsay on pay,
non-binding vote‚€Ě is truly necessary.

Farm Credit of New Mexico is in total agreement that transparency to our
shareholders is critical in the financial environment today.  Creating a
‚€œnon-binding vote‚€Ě on decisions made by their elected peers does not
improve transparency but can create confusion and dismay amongst
stockholders.  Our Directors have been sent to training sessions
pertaining to compensation and ways to retain talented senior management,
whereas, the remaining shareholders may not have the opportunity for the
training or to meet with consultants that understand the true market
conditions in the area of compensation.  Finding and retaining top level
management is not easy today as we compete daily with other large
commercial banks for our talent pool.

Our Association has prided itself on establishing a strong competitive
salary program that is performance based.  Let me give you an example of
our performance base compensation program that our Association went
through in 2009.  During that year, our District Bank was unable to pay
their typical patronage and we also made a substantial funding to our
Allowance for Loan Losses Account.  Based on these two events occurring,
our earnings were approximately $5.0 million below our business plan.
Therefore, as CEO I went to the Board and informed them that our earnings
were not adequate to pay full patronage and our annual incentive payments
as per the year-end numbers.  As a team, we decide to cut the patronage by
50% and the variable incentive payments to employees were cut 50% too.
Therefore, I‚€™m here to say that management and boards do make the right
decisions when necessary and this was not presented to the membership for
a ‚€œnon-binding vote‚€Ě.  I share this past experience with you as the
following year, 2010; our Association‚€™s profitability returned to its
normal level and the compensation increase for senior management would
have exceeded a 15% increase due to substantial change in variable
incentive pay.  In turn, this would have created a need for a
‚€œnon-binding vote‚€Ě if the new guideline would have been in effect.
The way the Board of Directors handled this matter is the way any
corporation should deal with a poor year versus a good year.

Overall, the Farm Credit System has prided itself on doing the right
things for many years and this is evident with the number of financially
sound Associations across the country.  To create a new- confusing process
such as a ‚€œnon-binding vote‚€Ě for all shareholders will not benefit the
system long term as it does open up a great amount of exposure to our
current board members.  Our Association today has a difficult time finding
candidates to run for director positions.  So if we add more potential
exposure to these positions we may have additional issues down the road.
Therefore, I encourage FCA to consider Farm Credit Council‚€™s suggestion
of consulting Congress on their thoughts on ‚€œsay on pay, non-binding
vote‚€Ě and consider some of the additional disclosures for compensation
programs that Farm Credit Council has recommended within specific
Association‚€™s Annual Financial Reports.

Farm Credit of New Mexico appreciates any consideration you may give to
prevent the non-binding, advisory vote provisions.


Alfred E. Porter, Jr.