| FCA Examination Manual |
| Module | Finance |
| Section | Earnings |
| Number | EM-415 |
| Date Published | 06/1994 |
Introduction
The continued viability of an institution depends on its ability to earn an appropriate return on its assets and capital. Good earnings performance enables an institution to fund expansion, remain competitive in the marketplace, and replenish and/or increase capital. Additionally, earnings represent the institution's first line of defense against capital depletion due to credit losses, interest rate risk, and operational risk.
In Farm Credit System (System) institutions, the principal source of earnings is interest income. Accordingly, pricing of the loan portfolio is a key aspect of an institution's earnings management. Institutions must price loan products in a manner sufficient to cover costs and provide the capitalization needed to protect the institution against losses and allow for growth. For detailed information on loan pricing and examining this critical area, refer to the Asset/Liability Management section in this module.
The analysis of earnings requires consideration of several factors, such as earnings level and quality; capital position, quality, and goals; asset quality and degree of credit risk exposure; management performance and earnings philosophy; and the institution's interest rate risk exposure and loan pricing practices. As such, the examiner evaluating earnings must coordinate closely with examiners conducting other aspects of the examination work so that results can be integrated into the final earnings analysis.
Examination Objectives
The fundamental examination objective in the earnings area is to determine the overall adequacy of the institution's present and projected earnings performance. This is accomplished through the following principal objectives:
Evaluate the quantity of earnings in light of all identifiable operational risks;
Assess the quality of earnings by focusing on factors such as composition, stability, and sustainability;
Evaluate the impact of the institution's loan pricing philosophy and practices on earnings performance; and
Conclude on the effectiveness of management in providing financial plans, programs, and controls which result in sufficient earnings to ensure the institution's long-term financial viability.
Criteria and Guidance
The earnings evaluation process involves analysis of numerous factors. Not all of these factors can be measured objectively. Moreover, even those that can be quantified to varying degrees need to be interpreted subjectively. Consequently, the following discussion of evaluative factors integrates both quantitative and qualitative factors, including qualitative factors designed to provide the examiner a prospective view of the institution's earnings performance. The five key evaluative factors discussed below are:
- Earnings level;
- Composition;
- Stability;
- Portfolio risk; and
- Earnings management.
Prior to evaluating these factors, examiners should gain a thorough understanding of the institution's capital position and goals. Examiners should read the Capital section in conjunction with this section on earnings due to the significant interrelationship between these CAMEL factors.
Earnings Level
The most obvious earnings performance factor to consider is the past, present, and projected level of earnings. The level of earnings is considered adequate when it is sufficient to pay all expenses, including necessary provisions to the allowance for losses; accumulate capital to meet the long-term needs and objectives of the institution; and provide an appropriate return to shareholders.
Specific considerations in evaluating the level of earnings include:
- Is income sufficient to cover all expenses, including the provision for loan losses?
- Is the institution achieving sufficient earnings to meet capital needs and achieve capital goals? The level, quality, and management of capital are key determinants of the necessary level of earnings.
- Has the institution achieved its business plan earnings targets? Examiners should identify the causes of variances in actual versus projected performance. Consideration should also be given to whether the institution's earnings targets were reasonable and appropriate to the level of risk.
- How do the institution's earnings statistics and ratios compare to a peer group of similar institutions? Care should be taken when using peer data as institutions of similar size may have significantly different portfolio characteristics or unique levels of capital and risk.
- What are the current trends in net income and its significant components? What are the underlying causal factors behind any such trends? An analytical review of trends can assist the examiner in identifying areas of weakness which require further evaluation, such as loan pricing problems or high operating expense levels.
Key statistical measurements in assessing the level of earnings include: return on assets, return on equity, and net interest margin. Return on assets is a key measure of how well the institution is using resources (assets) to generate income. Return on equity measures profitability relative to the institution's capital base. Net interest margin is an indicator of loan pricing effectiveness.
It is critical for examiners to keep in mind the level of earnings is but one evaluative factor in assessing earnings. A complete earnings evaluation must consider not only the level of earnings, but also the quality. The assessment of earnings quality is discussed throughout the remainder of this section.
Composition
To determine the quality of earnings, examiners must first identify the composition of net income. This involves analyzing specific income items to determine the source (i.e., the underlying origin or specific ledger entries) and, ultimately, the quality. Specific expense items should also be identified and analyzed to ensure reasonableness. In System institutions, income and expenses can typically be categorized as follows:
- Net Interest Income (NII)--NII (interest income minus interest expense) is the primary source of quality earnings in System institutions. Examiners should identify the specific sources of NII, such as regular accrual loans, restructured loans, cash basis loans, investments, etc., to determine the likelihood of continued interest accruals.
- Provisions for Losses--Provisions for losses are charges to income for estimable and probable losses in the institution's assets. System institutions have experienced wide variations in earnings due to large provisions and subsequent reversals of provisions.
- Noninterest Income --There are several sources of noninterest income in System institutions, with the most common being financially related services (FRS), fees, patronage, dividends, financial assistance received, and compensation received by associations for servicing bank assets.
- Net Gains or Losses--Common examples include gains and losses from sales of other property owned, securities, and other assets. Net gains and losses are typically not a recurring source of income. However, if the institution has demonstrated a steady history of net gains or losses from a common source, examiners should give this due consideration in the earnings analysis.
- Noninterest Expenses--Noninterest expense is primarily operating expenses, but could also include other items such as financial assistance provided and Farm Credit System Financial Assistance Corporation debt expense.
- Income Taxes--Appropriate tax accruals should be made on a regular basis, and at least with enough frequency to allow for the preparation of accurate income statements. Income taxes are not applicable for Farm Credit Banks, Federal Land Bank Associations, and Federal Land Credit Associations.
- Extraordinary Items--Extraordinary items are typically the result of a nonrecurring event. An example may be a one-time adjustment due to an accounting practice change.
Specific considerations in assessing the composition of earnings include:
- Is the institution's allowance for losses adequate? Examiners should identify the reasons for allowance provisions and reversals (e.g., changes in credit risk, the institution's allowance procedures, or accounting practices).
- Does the institution generate a significant amount of noninterest income, such as loan fees and financially related services income? Are controls in place to ensure fee and financially related service (FRS) income is collected? Does management determine if FRS programs are profitable?
- Has the institution made dividend or patronage payouts? If so, are the amounts reasonable and consistent with the institution's capital position and goals?
- Have earnings been impacted by nonoperating gains or losses, such as other property owned disposition or sale of investments? Does the institution expect additional gains/losses in future reporting periods? The impact of nonrecurring items, which are a lower quality source of income, should be considered when evaluating future earnings prospects.
- Is the institution complying with all relevant Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) which impact earnings? For example:
- SFAS 5--Accounting for Contingencies;
- SFAS 15--Accounting by Debtors and Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructurings;
- SFAS 91--Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans;
- SFAS 106--Employers' Accounting for Post-retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions; and
- SFAS 109--Accounting for Income Taxes.
- Is there consistency between accounting periods in the application of accounting practices?
Examiners should identify and explore any material changes or inconsistencies.
Stability
Another important consideration when evaluating the quality of earnings is stability. Stability is the consistency of earnings performance and the likelihood that earnings will continue. In assessing earnings stability, examiners should review past and present performance to determine the causes of any significant fluctuations in net income and its components. Examiners should focus on net income from operations, which is a higher quality source of earnings. Net income from operations is defined as net interest income minus provision for loan losses plus other operating income (based on Call Report Schedule RI-A) minus operating expenses (based on Call Report Schedule RI-C).
While important, it is not enough to simply review past and present earnings performance. Gaining a prospective view by evaluating the sustainability of earnings is of equal or greater importance. A review for reasonableness of the financial plans and budget, with particular attention to the underlying assumptions, is appropriate for this purpose. An obvious reasonableness check is to compare the institution's forecast to actual past performance. This evaluation serves to predict the future financial health of the institution.
The institution's financial forecast and assumptions should be consistent with what the examiner knows about the institution, such as the volume of adverse assets, nonaccrual and restructured loan volume, the adequacy of the allowance, and other examination findings that have an earnings implication. It will normally be necessary to discuss future growth and interest rate spread prospects with management. Examiners should attempt to identify any undue risk and highlight factors that may significantly impact future earnings performance.
Specific considerations in assessing the stability of earnings include:
- Have there been any changes in the institution's loan pricing policy or interest rate spreads which have/may impact NII? How are external conditions such as the interest rate environment impacting NII? Rising interest rates may make it more difficult to maintain spreads, while declining rates may make it easier to improve profits by increasing spreads.
- How has interest rate risk impacted earnings? What is the potential impact of interest rate risk on future earnings under various interest rate scenarios?
- Has planned asset growth been considered when completing financial plans? Earnings will likely need to be increased to meet the associated capital needs and rate of return requirements established by the board.
- Has the institution established a favorable earnings trend? Has earnings performance been consistent or erratic? Consideration should be given to the sources of net income to ensure stability from recurring operating sources.
- How have external factors or threats, such as laws and regulations, government programs, fiscal and monetary policy, weather, and the competitive environment, affected earnings performance? Has management, through the financial planning process, projected how these factors may impact future earnings? While these factors are largely uncontrollable, management should strategically plan for such events and take steps to either offset the effect or take advantage of likely scenarios.
- Based on analysis of the composition of earnings, how much fluctuation has occurred due to nonrecurring sources of earnings? Consider the extent to which things such as net gains or losses and extraordinary items contributed to net income.
- Does management anticipate any significant provisions or allowance reversals?
- What is the composition of the institution's balance sheet (e.g., high yielding loans/investments versus non- or low yielding nonaccruals, bank investments, or real property)? What impact do non- or low yielding assets have on earnings? The ratio of earning assets/total assets is a useful measure to consider.
- Does the institution have any obligation to repay financial assistance? If so, are earnings sufficient to meet such expenses?
Portfolio Risk
It is quite possible for an institution to register impressive profitability ratios and high dollar volumes of income by assuming an unacceptable degree of risk. Management may have taken on loans which provide the highest return possible, but are not of a quality to assure either continued debt servicing or principal repayment. By seeking higher rates on earning assets to underwrite an increased credit risk associated with that asset, short-term earnings will be boosted. Eventually, however, earnings may suffer if losses in these higher-risk assets are recognized. In addition, certain of the institution's adverse assets may need to be transferred to nonaccrual. If such assets are not placed in nonaccrual status, earnings will be overstated. Thus, the analysis of the institution's asset quality is interrelated to the analysis of earnings quality.
Specific considerations in assessing the impact of portfolio risk on earnings include:
- What is the impact of nonearning assets on earnings performance? Are significant future transfers of loans into or out of nonaccrual likely?
- Does the institution differentiate loan pricing based on risk? Loans should be priced to compensate for increased risk.
- Has the institution accurately identified and recorded known loan losses? Are probable losses accurately estimated and accounted for via provisions to the allowance for losses?
- Does the institution continually assess the impact of changes and potential changes in portfolio risk on earnings?
Earnings Management
The quality of earnings management is an essential evaluative factor in assessing earnings. Management must be able to adapt to changing market and risk conditions to ensure sufficient, stable, high quality earnings. Key management areas relative to earnings include pricing, financial planning, budgeting, expense control, interest rate risk management, and investment management.
Management and board earnings philosophies are also key factors to consider. In System institutions, most managers are not owners of the cooperative; thus, they may have less incentive to maximize profits. For board members, there is an inherent conflict of interest since most are also borrowers. Thus, personal interests to keep rates low conflict with earnings maximization for the institution. Boards must exercise discipline and sound judgment to price the portfolio to meet the institution's earnings needs.
Specific considerations in assessing earnings management include:
- How effectively have management and the board priced the loan portfolio? Do management information systems provide management with sufficient and timely loan pricing information, such as cost data, loan product data, and competitor rate information? Poor information systems may ignore funding and servicing costs, and encourage dependency on the practice of pricing to meet competition while acting as a precursor to predatory or other unsound pricing practices. Refer to the Asset/Liability Management section for additional loan pricing information.
- Does the institution have a sound financial planning and budgeting process? Does management periodically review financial performance in relation to plans? Actual results should be compared to projections, and any significant variances should receive appropriate review by management and the board. The initiation and periodic review of a financial plan and budget for earnings not only provide management with an effective administrative control, but also allow the examiner to gain a more thorough understanding of any unfavorable income and expense performance.
- Are the financial plan and budget accurate and realistic projections of expected income and expenditures? The budget should be consistent with the first year of the financial plan. Does management conduct analyses, or "what if" scenarios, to identify the potential impact on earnings from changing operating environments?
- Does management determine the costs and profitability of proposed lending and FRS programs prior to implementation? Does management monitor the profitability of such programs on an ongoing basis to enable the board to make sound decisions regarding continuation of such programs?
- Are operating expense levels reasonable? Does management adequately monitor and control expenditures? What action is management taking to control costs? Are salary and benefits expenses reasonable? Management's spending philosophy and practices should demonstrate prudence and result in expenditures which are in line with safe business practices. The ratio of operating expenses/average loans is a useful measure when analyzing the level of expenses.
- Have expense allocations in jointly operated institutions been adequately supported? Examiners should ensure management adequately documents and monitors expense allocations.
- Has interest rate risk (IRR) been accurately identified, measured, and appropriately managed? Examiners should understand the potential impact of IRR on the institution's earnings and ensure management actions in this area are consistent with financial plans and, specifically, earnings objectives.
Examination Procedures
The following provides model procedures for conducting an earnings evaluation. Consistent with risk-based examination principles, examiners should add, delete, or modify procedures as needed based on the particular circumstances of the institution.
1. Prior to evaluating earnings, analyze the institution's capital position (or discuss results of the capital analysis with the examiner assigned responsibility).
2. Coordinate earnings examination activities with other members of the examination team and the examiner-in-charge (EIC). Emphasis should be on identifying how examination findings in other areas impact the earnings analysis, ensuring sufficient work is completed to conclude on the quality and quantity of earnings, and avoiding duplication of examination effort. The following are examples of key areas which will likely require coordination with the earnings analysis:
- Allowance for loan losses;
- Loan portfolio management;
- Loan review;
- Asset/liability management;
- Business planning (including capital planning); and
- Liquidity.
3. Obtain earnings information for the current period, the same period the prior year, and prior yearends. Sources may include Call Report Schedule RI - Income Statement (and supporting schedules), Consolidated Reporting System reports including Uniform Performance Reports, institution income statements, and stockholder reports. Also, obtain the institution's budget, long-range financial plans, and any earnings-related analyses completed by the institution.
4. Utilize discussions with institution managers as needed to gather information and discuss trends, future operating environment expectations, volume goals, projected fluctuations in earnings, nonrecurring items, accounting practice changes, etc.
5. Evaluate the quantity of earnings by:
a. Identifying the past and present level of net income to determine if income was sufficient to cover expenses and loan loss provisions, and achieve- budget and financial plan targets.
b. Reviewing actual performance compared to business plan targets to determine if the institution's earnings performance was sufficient to meet capital goals.
c. Reviewing the institution's long-range financial plans to determine if projected earnings are sufficient to meet future capital needs and goals.
d. Compiling and reviewing key statistical data, such as return on assets, return on equity, net interest margin, operating expenses/average loans, earning assets/ total assets, etc., and comparing them to peers, industry standards, the institution's budget, and historical results.
6. Evaluate the quality of earnings by:
a. Identifying the composition of earnings to determine whether income and expense items are recurring or nonrecurring, and noting any significant trends or changes in net income and its components. Possible red flags include:
- Earnings are static or declining as a percentage of total assets;
- Net income from operations is decreasing as a percentage of total revenues;
- The ratio of operating expenses/average loans is increasing or may already be excessive;
- The net interest margin is declining;
- Loan losses are increasing; and
- Items subject to management discretion (such as loan loss reversals) are increasing.
b. Identifying the stability of earnings and determining whether earnings are likely to continue. Considerations may include:
- Changes in loan pricing policies or lending programs;
- Shifts in board/management earnings philosophy;
- Possible allowance provisions or reversals;
- External conditions which may impact interest rates or other income and expense items;
- Trends in dividend and patronage income and payouts, and the likelihood they will continue;
- Expected nonrecurring sources of income, such as potential gains or losses;
- Trends in operating expense levels and potential increases for items such as salaries and benefits or incentive programs;
- Financial assistance repayment obligations;
- Impact of changes or errors in accounting practices;
- Impact of interest rate risk;
- Effect of planned asset growth;
- Fluctuation due to nonrecurring sources of income and expense; and
- Composition of the balance sheet and planned changes.
7. Determine the impact of findings from the asset examination on earnings. Considerations may include:
- Additional credit risk which may reduce future earnings;
- Loan chargeoffs that have not been recorded;
- The adequacy of the allowance for losses; and
- Adjustments to interest income for loans which require transfer into nonaccrual.
8. Evaluate the management of earnings by determining:
a. Effectiveness of loan pricing and reasonableness of pricing philosophy;
b. Quality of financial planning and budgeting processes;
c. Management of lending, fee, and financially related services programs;
d. Sufficiency and timeliness of efforts to control expenses;
e. Accuracy of expense allocations in jointly managed institutions; and
f. Effectiveness of interest rate risk identification, measurement, and management.
9. Weigh the results of all earnings examination work and draw tentative conclusions giving consideration to cause, effect, materiality, and results of other related examination work.
10. Discuss tentative conclusions and examination findings with examiners responsible for the capital, liquidity, asset/liability management, and management evaluations.
11. Discuss items of concern, scope of work performed, and conclusions with the EIC and with the appropriate institution manager. Obtain a response regarding cause(s) of deficiencies or weaknesses and anticipated corrective actions.
12. Prepare a leadsheet or other summary document to provide workpaper support for the work performed and the conclusions reached.
[FCA Home | Examination Manual]