Previous Document IconPrevious Document in Exam Manual

Next Document IconNext Document in Exam ManualExam Manual Table of Contents IconExam Manual Table of Contents

FCA Examination Manual
ModuleFinance
SectionEarnings
NumberEM-415
Date Published06/1994

Introduction


The continued viability of an institution depends on its ability to earn an appropriate return on its assets and capital. Good earnings performance enables an institution to fund expansion, remain competitive in the marketplace, and replenish and/or increase capital. Additionally, earnings represent the institution's first line of defense against capital depletion due to credit losses, interest rate risk, and operational risk.

In Farm Credit System (System) institutions, the principal source of earnings is interest income. Accordingly, pricing of the loan portfolio is a key aspect of an institution's earnings management. Institutions must price loan products in a manner sufficient to cover costs and provide the capitalization needed to protect the institution against losses and allow for growth. For detailed information on loan pricing and examining this critical area, refer to the Asset/Liability Management section in this module.

The analysis of earnings requires consideration of several factors, such as earnings level and quality; capital position, quality, and goals; asset quality and degree of credit risk exposure; management performance and earnings philosophy; and the institution's interest rate risk exposure and loan pricing practices. As such, the examiner evaluating earnings must coordinate closely with examiners conducting other aspects of the examination work so that results can be integrated into the final earnings analysis.

Examination Objectives

The fundamental examination objective in the earnings area is to determine the overall adequacy of the institution's present and projected earnings performance. This is accomplished through the following principal objectives:

Evaluate the quantity of earnings in light of all identifiable operational risks;

Assess the quality of earnings by focusing on factors such as composition, stability, and sustainability; Evaluate the impact of the institution's loan pricing philosophy and practices on earnings performance; and Conclude on the effectiveness of management in providing financial plans, programs, and controls which result in sufficient earnings to ensure the institution's long-term financial viability.

Criteria and Guidance

The earnings evaluation process involves analysis of numerous factors. Not all of these factors can be measured objectively. Moreover, even those that can be quantified to varying degrees need to be interpreted subjectively. Consequently, the following discussion of evaluative factors integrates both quantitative and qualitative factors, including qualitative factors designed to provide the examiner a prospective view of the institution's earnings performance. The five key evaluative factors discussed below are:

Prior to evaluating these factors, examiners should gain a thorough understanding of the institution's capital position and goals. Examiners should read the Capital section in conjunction with this section on earnings due to the significant interrelationship between these CAMEL factors.

Earnings Level

The most obvious earnings performance factor to consider is the past, present, and projected level of earnings. The level of earnings is considered adequate when it is sufficient to pay all expenses, including necessary provisions to the allowance for losses; accumulate capital to meet the long-term needs and objectives of the institution; and provide an appropriate return to shareholders.

Specific considerations in evaluating the level of earnings include:

Key statistical measurements in assessing the level of earnings include: return on assets, return on equity, and net interest margin. Return on assets is a key measure of how well the institution is using resources (assets) to generate income. Return on equity measures profitability relative to the institution's capital base. Net interest margin is an indicator of loan pricing effectiveness.

It is critical for examiners to keep in mind the level of earnings is but one evaluative factor in assessing earnings. A complete earnings evaluation must consider not only the level of earnings, but also the quality. The assessment of earnings quality is discussed throughout the remainder of this section.

Composition

To determine the quality of earnings, examiners must first identify the composition of net income. This involves analyzing specific income items to determine the source (i.e., the underlying origin or specific ledger entries) and, ultimately, the quality. Specific expense items should also be identified and analyzed to ensure reasonableness. In System institutions, income and expenses can typically be categorized as follows:
Specific considerations in assessing the composition of earnings include:
- SFAS 5--Accounting for Contingencies;

- SFAS 15--Accounting by Debtors and Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructurings;

- SFAS 91--Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans;

- SFAS 106--Employers' Accounting for Post-retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions; and

- SFAS 109--Accounting for Income Taxes.
Examiners should identify and explore any material changes or inconsistencies.

Stability

Another important consideration when evaluating the quality of earnings is stability. Stability is the consistency of earnings performance and the likelihood that earnings will continue. In assessing earnings stability, examiners should review past and present performance to determine the causes of any significant fluctuations in net income and its components. Examiners should focus on net income from operations, which is a higher quality source of earnings. Net income from operations is defined as net interest income minus provision for loan losses plus other operating income (based on Call Report Schedule RI-A) minus operating expenses (based on Call Report Schedule RI-C).

While important, it is not enough to simply review past and present earnings performance. Gaining a prospective view by evaluating the sustainability of earnings is of equal or greater importance. A review for reasonableness of the financial plans and budget, with particular attention to the underlying assumptions, is appropriate for this purpose. An obvious reasonableness check is to compare the institution's forecast to actual past performance. This evaluation serves to predict the future financial health of the institution.

The institution's financial forecast and assumptions should be consistent with what the examiner knows about the institution, such as the volume of adverse assets, nonaccrual and restructured loan volume, the adequacy of the allowance, and other examination findings that have an earnings implication. It will normally be necessary to discuss future growth and interest rate spread prospects with management. Examiners should attempt to identify any undue risk and highlight factors that may significantly impact future earnings performance.

Specific considerations in assessing the stability of earnings include:

Portfolio Risk

It is quite possible for an institution to register impressive profitability ratios and high dollar volumes of income by assuming an unacceptable degree of risk. Management may have taken on loans which provide the highest return possible, but are not of a quality to assure either continued debt servicing or principal repayment. By seeking higher rates on earning assets to underwrite an increased credit risk associated with that asset, short-term earnings will be boosted. Eventually, however, earnings may suffer if losses in these higher-risk assets are recognized. In addition, certain of the institution's adverse assets may need to be transferred to nonaccrual. If such assets are not placed in nonaccrual status, earnings will be overstated. Thus, the analysis of the institution's asset quality is interrelated to the analysis of earnings quality.

Specific considerations in assessing the impact of portfolio risk on earnings include:

Earnings Management

The quality of earnings management is an essential evaluative factor in assessing earnings. Management must be able to adapt to changing market and risk conditions to ensure sufficient, stable, high quality earnings. Key management areas relative to earnings include pricing, financial planning, budgeting, expense control, interest rate risk management, and investment management.

Management and board earnings philosophies are also key factors to consider. In System institutions, most managers are not owners of the cooperative; thus, they may have less incentive to maximize profits. For board members, there is an inherent conflict of interest since most are also borrowers. Thus, personal interests to keep rates low conflict with earnings maximization for the institution. Boards must exercise discipline and sound judgment to price the portfolio to meet the institution's earnings needs.

Specific considerations in assessing earnings management include:

Examination Procedures

The following provides model procedures for conducting an earnings evaluation. Consistent with risk-based examination principles, examiners should add, delete, or modify procedures as needed based on the particular circumstances of the institution.

1. Prior to evaluating earnings, analyze the institution's capital position (or discuss results of the capital analysis with the examiner assigned responsibility).

2. Coordinate earnings examination activities with other members of the examination team and the examiner-in-charge (EIC). Emphasis should be on identifying how examination findings in other areas impact the earnings analysis, ensuring sufficient work is completed to conclude on the quality and quantity of earnings, and avoiding duplication of examination effort. The following are examples of key areas which will likely require coordination with the earnings analysis:

3. Obtain earnings information for the current period, the same period the prior year, and prior yearends. Sources may include Call Report Schedule RI - Income Statement (and supporting schedules), Consolidated Reporting System reports including Uniform Performance Reports, institution income statements, and stockholder reports. Also, obtain the institution's budget, long-range financial plans, and any earnings-related analyses completed by the institution.

4. Utilize discussions with institution managers as needed to gather information and discuss trends, future operating environment expectations, volume goals, projected fluctuations in earnings, nonrecurring items, accounting practice changes, etc.

5. Evaluate the quantity of earnings by:

a. Identifying the past and present level of net income to determine if income was sufficient to cover expenses and loan loss provisions, and achieve- budget and financial plan targets.

b. Reviewing actual performance compared to business plan targets to determine if the institution's earnings performance was sufficient to meet capital goals.

c. Reviewing the institution's long-range financial plans to determine if projected earnings are sufficient to meet future capital needs and goals.

d. Compiling and reviewing key statistical data, such as return on assets, return on equity, net interest margin, operating expenses/average loans, earning assets/ total assets, etc., and comparing them to peers, industry standards, the institution's budget, and historical results.

6. Evaluate the quality of earnings by:

a. Identifying the composition of earnings to determine whether income and expense items are recurring or nonrecurring, and noting any significant trends or changes in net income and its components. Possible red flags include:

b. Identifying the stability of earnings and determining whether earnings are likely to continue. Considerations may include:

7. Determine the impact of findings from the asset examination on earnings. Considerations may include:

8. Evaluate the management of earnings by determining:

a. Effectiveness of loan pricing and reasonableness of pricing philosophy;

b. Quality of financial planning and budgeting processes;

c. Management of lending, fee, and financially related services programs;

d. Sufficiency and timeliness of efforts to control expenses;

e. Accuracy of expense allocations in jointly managed institutions; and

f. Effectiveness of interest rate risk identification, measurement, and management.

9. Weigh the results of all earnings examination work and draw tentative conclusions giving consideration to cause, effect, materiality, and results of other related examination work.

10. Discuss tentative conclusions and examination findings with examiners responsible for the capital, liquidity, asset/liability management, and management evaluations.

11. Discuss items of concern, scope of work performed, and conclusions with the EIC and with the appropriate institution manager. Obtain a response regarding cause(s) of deficiencies or weaknesses and anticipated corrective actions.

12. Prepare a leadsheet or other summary document to provide workpaper support for the work performed and the conclusions reached.

[FCA Home | Examination Manual]